Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0496

reference
148-tree-1
name
0496
tree-preservation-order

undefined

148-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.003682 50.852357)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.003612 50.852350,-1.003615 50.852364,-1.003625 50.852376,-1.003640 50.852387,-1.003660 50.852393,-1.003682 50.852396,-1.003704 50.852393,-1.003724 50.852387,-1.003739 50.852377,-1.003750 50.852365,-1.003754 50.852351,-1.003750 50.852337,-1.003741 50.852325,-1.003725 50.852315,-1.003705 50.852308,-1.003684 50.852306,-1.003662 50.852308,-1.003642 50.852314,-1.003626 50.852324,-1.003615 50.852336,-1.003612 50.852350)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL